Home / Uncategorized / Scooter startup Bird claims San Francisco wants to shut it down

Scooter startup Bird claims San Francisco wants to shut it down

Travis VanderZanden
Bird CEO Travis VanderZanden


  • An electrical scooter startup despatched a press unlock to newshounds claiming San Francisco used to be making plans to ban such scooters.
  • But a town professional denied the fee, announcing San Francisco is handiest taking into account regulating them, no longer banning them.
  • The town has gained a large number of lawsuits in regards to the electrical scooters since 3 venture-backed firms introduced their services and products there just lately — and their gadgets began being strewn about on sidewalks.

San Francisco can have a name for being an overregulated town. But that does not essentially imply it’s making plans to ban electrical scooters, regardless of a startup’s caution cry that any such prohibition used to be coming near near.

On-demand electrical scooter startup Bird on Thursday claimed town of San Francisco used to be making an attempt to shut it down. In a “breaking” press unlock despatched to the San Francisco Chronicle and SF Curbed the corporate claimed the San Francisco Board of Supervisors used to be about to institute an emergency ban on scooters within the town.

But Supervisor Aaron Peskin denied the declare, telling the Chronicle Bird is spreading “misinformation.” Peskin plans to introduce regulation that may keep an eye on scooters, no longer ban them.

“Contrary to Bird’s assertions, regulations are not bans,” Peskin mentioned in a remark to Business Insider.

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, which is operating with Peskin at the invoice and would oversee the allowing procedure for scooters underneath it, didn’t reply to a request for remark.

Bird spokesman Ken Baer declined to title the supply of the corporate’s trust ban used to be coming near near, announcing handiest that the corporate used to be responding to “pretty good information, enough that we felt it was important for us to go out.”

“We hope they’re wrong, or maybe they changed their minds once we went public,” Baer mentioned. “It actually doesn’t matter, as long as we get to the right outcome, which is to not rush into doing anything hasty and banning this transportation option for the city.”

At least one in all Bird’s competitors used to be much less alarmed, although. Euwyn Poon, cofounder of Spin, a rival electrical scooter sharing startup, informed Business Insider his corporate hadn’t heard anything else from town about the opportunity of banning electrical scooters anytime quickly.

“Numerous” lawsuits

San Francisco’s sidewalks have grow to be cluttered with electrical scooters in contemporary weeks as 3 venture-capital funded startups — LimeBikes, Spin, and Bird — have introduced their on-demand services and products within the town. The firms’ services and products all paintings in a similar fashion: Customers use an app to discover a close by scooter they may be able to borrow. They then simply go away them at the sidewalk when they are achieved with them, even if Bird’s app recommends parking its scooters at motorcycle racks on every occasion imaginable and no longer blockading entrances.

Unlike some motorcycle sharing firms, Bird and the opposite scooter firms are not offering docks for purchasers to park the scooters in. So they may be able to be left in the back of almost about any place. That’s led to “numerous” lawsuits, John Cote, a spokesman for the ity lawyer’s place of business, informed Business Insider in a remark.

A line of Bird’s electrical scooters. San Francisco citizens have complained the scooters often are not left in the back of in as orderly a way.


Citizens have complained in regards to the scooters mechanically blockading sidewalks and construction entrances, inflicting folks to commute, and making sidewalks much less obtainable for individuals who use wheelchairs. Residents have additionally reported encountering folks using the scooters, which is able to succeed in speeds of up to 15 miles in line with hour, on sidewalks, which is prohibited.

San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera mentioned his place of business is thinking about taking criminal motion in opposition to the scooter firms.

“The bottom line is our sidewalks need to be safe for pedestrians,” Dennis Herrera, San Francisco’s town lawyer, informed Business Insider in a remark. “They are not dumping grounds for commercial scooters. Kids, parents with strollers, seniors or people in wheelchairs shouldn’t be tripping over scooters or forced into traffic to get around them.”

But such lawsuits want to be weighed in opposition to the various advantages scooters supply, Bird’s Baer mentioned. The gadgets are environmentally-friendly and will assist decreasing visitors congestion from vehicles, he mentioned.

Bird would really like to paintings with town on imaginable rules, Baer mentioned.

San Francisco is not the primary town to struggle with Bird

Bird has raised $115 million to date, together with a $100 million spherical led by way of Valor Equity Partners and Index Ventures that it introduced ultimate month.

The corporate’s ranks come with a large number of staff who were given their get started at trip hailing firms Uber and Lyft. Among them is its founder and CEO, Travis VanderZanden, who used to be Lyft’s first leader working officer ahead of changing into vp of motive force enlargement at Uber.

Bird’s war with San Francisco is not its first with a town executive. It evolved a contentious dating with town of Santa Monica, California, quickly after launching its provider there in September as its first marketplace.

Bird began working within the town with out prior to now notifying town officers, The Washington Post reported. A legal criticism has since been filed in opposition to the startup for failing to download a allow to function.

In reaction to characterizations that Bird is performing like Uber, which used to be notorious for flouting native ordinances, Baer mentioned that whilst Uber used to be “clearly in violation” of native rules, Bird is not. San Francisco, for instance, didn’t prior to now have a regulation governing electrical scooter services and products, he mentioned.

“For this, I don’t see what the argument is for being illegal,” Baer mentioned. “No one is pointing to a law on the books saying ‘it’s illegal.'”

Additional reporting by way of Senior Tech Reporter Melia Robinson

About Joel Johnson

Joel S. Johnson writes for Business Finance Section in AmericaRichest.

Check Also

Fintech Ecosystem – Financial Technology Research & Business Opportunities

BII This is a preview of a analysis document from Business Insider Intelligence, Business Insider’s …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *