Home / Start Ups / Investors / Walmart’s Biggest Liability: Labor Costs (WMT)

Walmart’s Biggest Liability: Labor Costs (WMT)

Is Walmart’s Biggest Liability Labor Costs?

In a company as large as Walmart Stores Inc (WMT), it can be hard to increase profit by a measurable degree. Increasing margins on soap won’t affect the bottom, nor will saving on nominal expenses like plastic bags.

What Walmart can control though, is its labor force. Walmart’s biggest expense is its labor costs. Currently, Walmart is the third-largest employer in the world after the United States and Chinese Armies. Finding a way to save money on labor, or to eliminate jobs altogether, may be a huge boon to the retailer.

Understanding Walmart’s Labor Costs

Walmart’s Labor History

What Walmart Workers Want

Why Does Walmart Act Like This?

Walmart doesn’t give in to these demands because it can’t afford to. In the 2015 fiscal year, Walmart made a profit of $16 billion. This figure, when divided among Walmart’s 2 million-plus employees worldwide only works out to an additional $7,355 per year, or $3.67 per hour—and that’s with the company making no profit, something that private companies aren’t in the habit of doing.

It should also be noted that since the 2015 fiscal year annual report was released in January 2015, Walmart has increased its wages twice and that its minimum wage now stands at $10 per hour, making the $16 billion profit figure unlikely to be repeated for some time.

Walmart increased employee wages because it had to. The company was facing immense pressure from the media, its employees, and outside organizations for wage increases. With churn costs 1.5 to 2.5 times the cost of the employee’s salary, Walmart needs to continually focus on employee retention.

With the media running weekly stories about the poor working conditions at Walmart or the social services received by Walmart employees, the company needed a plan to stop the negative PR. Plus, as other retailers increase their wages and benefits, Walmart’s management is forced to do so as well, otherwise it would be left with a lack of applicants for its positions.

Cost Savings

Instead of paying each employee a higher wage and then reducing their hours, Walmart ought to revamp its entire strategy to cut the number of workers it employs. (For more, see: Wal-Mart Plans Corporate Job Cuts.)

Walmart has 1.4 million American workers. What Walmart doesn’t have is mass-automation. Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) uses robots in its distribution centers to pick orders. Competing retailers and grocers have replaced cashiers with self-serve checkouts.

Walmart could replicate some of Amazon’s practices by automating more of its distribution centers (at a high cost) or, it can easily cut its number of cashiers by 50% to 75% by replacing people with self-serve machines. These workers can be hired full-time and receive benefits.

Employees will be happier with their increased competition and their jobs will be easier as they supervise a bank of self-serve check-outs, rather than have to serve customers themselves.

Self-serve has been implemented in every industry because of its incredible savings power. Retailers, airlines, restaurants, banks—they’ve all convinced consumers that doing work themselves is the best thing for them and the companies have reaped the financial benefits from it. Walmart needs to follow suit.

Source link

About Amy Harvey

Amy R. Harvey writes forStartUps Sections In AmericaRichest.

Check Also

What Are the Pros and Cons of Raising the Minimum Wage?

On July 18, 2019, the U.S. House of Representatives passed an amended version of the …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *